Why a HOT SPARE Hard Disk Is a Bad Idea

Updated on 03/08/2021

Due, in part, to the different views and opinions regarding the usage of hot spare disks in our previous post, we’ve decided to add an update for clarification. 

The Problematic Aspects of Using a Hot Spare Disk

As stated in almost every theory, using a hot spare disk with ZFS, or in any other data storage environment is a good solution, as it automatically responds to malfunctions in a RAID and helps minimize the duration of a degraded array state.

That being said, the primary goal of creating a RAID is to ensure continuous operation and prevent data loss in the event of a disk failure. Therefore, anything that increases the risk of data loss could be considered a bad idea. Let’s take a closer look at some of the problematic aspects of using hot spare disks.

Hot Spare Disks Add Stress to Vulnerable Systems

The primary issue with hot spare disks is that they enable the rebuilding (resilvering) of a system that is still in active use as a production server. While the resilvering process is taking place, the system will also continue to process the usual production data reads and writes. 

Resilvering is a process that consumes significant server resources. When executed while the server is still in use, it must compete with production workloads. Because it is treated as a low-priority task, the resilvering process can take an extended amount of time – sometimes even several days. This prolonged operation at maximum throughput can put considerable strain on the disks, especially HDDs, and may lead to serious wear or potential failures.

Having decades worth of experience, we’ve realized that the use of hot spare disks in complex enterprise systems increases the probability of additional disks failing as the resilvering process starts to put more and more stress on the existing disks and the system itself. 

Problems in Overall Hot Spare Disk Design

The next flaw of a hot spare disk is that it degrades over time. From the moment it is connected to the system, it keeps on working. And when, eventually, it’s time for it to be used as a damaged disk’s replacement; the hot spare disk itself could simply not be in a good enough state to actually replace the damaged disk.

Another issue with hot spare disks is that they are activated automatically when a disk failure is detected, even if the failed disk is still connected to the system. The faulty disk might attempt to reconnect and operate again while the hot spare is taking over its role, creating additional stress on the system. This can impact overall performance and, in some cases, increase the risk of data loss.

Hot Spare Disks Create a Single Point of Failure

If your goal is to build a system with no single point of failure, relying on a hot spare disk won’t provide much confidence. The process of automatically replacing a failed disk can sometimes fail (partially or completely), which may lead to data loss.

From our decades of experience providing data storage solutions with Open-E, we’ve seen many cases where a hot spare disk actually caused a full server failure or even permanent data loss. The risk comes from automation: once triggered, it can set off a domino effect, especially in older infrastructures where hardware has already experienced years of wear.

Recommended Procedure in Case of a Disk Failure

These problematic aspects of hot spare disks are why our advice would be to not rely on hot spare disks in complex data storage architectures and to use other business continuity solutions instead. This is On- & Off-site Data Protection with user defined backup retention-interval plans reducing RPO & RTO to minutes.

Using the ZFS file system, it’s much easier to monitor the system and create a proper backup. With that, you have the ability to retrieve data from a damaged disk and write it onto a new one. Additionally, when using a HA cluster, there is an option to manually switch the production from the affected node to a secondary one, allowing for maintenance on the affected node. 

Recommended Procedure in Case of a Disk Failure:

We’d advise following this procedure once the array shows that a degraded state has occurred as a result of a disk failure:

1. Run a full data backup.
2. Verify the backed-up data for consistency and confirm that the data restore mechanism is functioning properly.
3. Identify the problem source, i.e., find the erroneous hard disk. If possible, shut down the server and ensure the serial number of the hard disk matches the one reported by the event viewer or system logs.
4. Replace the faulty hard disk with a new, unused one. If the replacement hard disk had already been used within another RAID array; make sure that any residual RAID metadata on it has been deleted via the original RAID controller.
5. Start a rebuild of the system.

With this manual process, the rebuild involves 5 steps. By contrast, using a hot spare disk skips the first four critical steps and automatically moves to steps 4 and 5. This means the rebuild completes before you’ve had the chance to run backups, verify data, or confirm the faulty hardware – steps that often make the difference between safe data and lost data.

Anyway, it’s still completely up to you as to how to build a proper system. Anyway, it’s still entirely up to you to determine how to build a proper system. However, we suggest avoiding dependency on hot spare disks in a ZFS RAID array due to the potential data loss they can cause.

• Hard diskHot spare